Human Skeleton with Horns Discovered by Coal Miners Underneath Knoxville, TN

By TheRundownLive

5x7-66_2

Kristan T. Harris | The Rundown Live

Did a race of humans with horns protruding from their skulls once roam this planet? Fantastic articles cataloged at the Library of Congress website combine credible institutions and scientists to remarkable skeletal discoveries.

The Bismarck tribune on August 10, 1921, published an article that workers over at Keene-Strunk coal company unearthed a horned human skeleton of ‘giant’ size equipped with a beautiful chain:

“Work men on the Keene-Strunk Coal company at Helenwood, Scott county, have found buried in the earth and petrified a giant six feet four inches tall. Imbedded in the one-time flesh about his neck is a beautiful chain. The fingers are perfect with long tapering nails. The hands are folded across the breast. On either side of its head are two horns each about four inches in length. It’s weight is about 450 pounds.

The miners removed it from the earth and carried it to Helenwood, where it was put on exhibition.”

Another incredible article I found was from the Minneapolis Journal, dated August 08, 1903. A discovery in Oregon of a “human skeleton with horns attached to the skull” resulted in much attention from scientists belonging to the Smithsonian Institution.

“However, it is a fact well known to anatomists that horny excrescences upon the face and body of human subjects are by no means rare, and were also known to the ancients.”, one scientist said.

“That woodland deity, the Satyr, depicted with goat like ears, budding horns and a short tail, did not grow all together by imagination of the ancients either as to horns or tail.”

According to Smithsonian scientists “among collected examples of human grown horns in a medical museum in London, there is one eleven inches long and two and a half inches in circumference.”

oregonskeleton

Sixty-eight skeletons of men averaging to be seven feet tall, some with horns one inch long were found in Chemung, New York:

A QUEER FELLOW

He was seven feet in height. Horns protruded from his skull. His name (given him by his party) is “pithecanththropes erectus” . Perhaps he was an indian, perhaps not. At the age of thirty-five he was a tottering old gentleman: at forty or earlier he usually died. Conjure up your imagination a race of people 700 years old. Draw a mental picture of one of them. Make him seven feet tall and of perfect physique. Let him be strong but ignorant. (assumption).. Make him one of a race which at 35 years was growing old and which at 40 was near death. Finally give him horns about an inch long, protruding from his skull about two inches above the ears. Such a man there was once and no further from Elmira than what is now the Murray farm in Sayre.

HornedSkullNewsArticle1SM

human-horns-383x500The New York Daily News recently published an article about a lady who was over 100 years old and sprouted a goat-like horn. Many people in history also have been depicted with horns. Some to signify power and brilliance like Michelangelo’s statue of Moses, and others for deception like Satan.

Follow @RundownLive This article is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article with attribution to the author and TheRundownLive.com. Tune-in to the THERUNDOWNLIVE Monday-Friday @ 9pm EST; 6pm PST.

      

How the DEA Undermines Your Rights to Steal Your Money Without a Warrant

By The Rundown Live

StingRay

Carey Wedler | ANTIMEDIA

A new Inspector General report reveals that the DEA has been engaging in a racist, manipulative form of theft.

Civil asset forfeiture has come under recent fire because it allows government agencies like local police and the IRS to confiscate property and cash from citizensall without criminal convictions or charges. A new Inspector General report reveals that the DEA has been engaging in its own, racist form of this theft, calling it “cold consent” and conducting it in the nation’s airports and bus and train stations.

“Cold consent,” as Forbes explains, is employed when “a person is stopped if an agent thinks that person’s behavior fits a drug courier profile.” It can be prompted by no “particular behavior.” Officers ask the stopped subject for consent to question them and sometimes to search their property. In doing so, they avoid the need for a warrant. The Inspector General found that DEA interdiction task force groups seize cash, then urge people to sign documents that relinquish their money and “waive their rights.”

The DEA was able to seize $163 million in cash from 4,138 seizures from 2009-2013 (the DEA does not report how many of the seizures are cold consent, so a portion of this total might have been attained with other tactics). Cold consent, the Department of Justice has found, can have racist undertones. The DOJ said it was “more often associated with racial profiling than contacts based on previously acquired information.”

There were at least two instances from the Inspector General report of black women being targeted at airports. One was an attorney for the Pentagon who was traveling on government business. Agents reportedly subjected her to “aggressive and humiliating questioning.”

The other woman was stopped for “pacing nervously” before a flight. When a drug dog smelled cash on her, agents found $8,000. According to the Inspector General, they attempted to have her “sign a disclaimer of ownership form abandoning her money, but she declined to do so.” The DEA settled her case, but she was only allowed to keep $3,600 of her money.

Cold consent has been compared to stop and frisk, a notoriously racist program the NYPD is known for using. Further, civil asset forfeiture on the whole has been called racist, as well. Rand Paul said it “predominantly has targeted black individuals, poor individuals, Hispanic individuals.” In January, Eric Holder took steps to curtail the federal government’s involvement in the practice (the feds were taking 20% of police seizures).

The Inspector General’s report unfortunately confirms what many already know: that the government engages in a wide variety of exploitative and often racist campaigns in order to increase its own wealth and power at the expense of civil rights and liberties.

In the new report, the Inspector General’s office made several recommendations to the DEA, including keeping track of demographic data on cold consent stops and ensuring proper training for agents. The DEA “concurs” with all of the recommendations, but no suggestions were made to stop the practice outright or to curb the Drug War–the foundational problem underlying cold consent.


This article is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org. Tune in to the Anti-Media radio show Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.

The post How the DEA Undermines Your Rights to Steal Your Money Without a Warrant appeared first on The Anti-Media.

Read more here:: How the DEA Undermines Your Rights to Steal Your Money Without a Warrant

      

What Is Scientology Hiding?

By The Rundown Live

What Is Scientology Hiding?

“What Is Scientology Hiding?

From brainwashing techniques to missing persons to concentration camps – Alltime Conspiracies looks at the dark claims made about the world’s most secretive religion.

Don’t forget to Subscribe for more Conspiracies! – http://bit.ly/1dmVsvF

Like us on Facebook – http://on.fb.me/1eWsxhV

Follow us on Twitter – http://bit.ly/MNqFgY

Alltime’s greatest conspiracies… http://bit.ly/1eRToNK

      

Obama Actually Admits The Rise of ISIS Was Due to The US Government

By The Rundown Live

mccainisis

Cassius Methyl | ANTIMEDIA

Obama has finally admitted that is was bad US foreign policy that created ISIS, so why is he carrying out the same exact policy?

In an interview with Vice News (who sold out to the tune of about 70 million dollars from Rupert Murdoch‘s 21st Century Fox), Barack Obama actually admitted that the rise of ISIS was because of the US Government.

Instead of admitting such things as the fact that the ‘moderate rebels’ he funded joined ISIS, or admitting his own role in the rise of ISIS, he blamed George Bush; but hey, it’s still a step in the direction of admitting what is incredibly obvious. Or is it?

Obama said, “Two things: one is, ISIS is a direct outgrowth of al-Qaeda in Iraq that grew out of our invasion. Which is an example of unintended consequences. Which is why we should generally aim before we shoot.” and “We’ve got a 60 country coalition. We will slowly push back Isis out of Iraq”, “I’m confident that will happen.”

Really, this is no kind of admission, this is more like a subversive and insidious tactic of ignoring more glaring examples of the US supporting ISIS.

He could have admitted that the Syrian Rebels he funded defected to ISIS, or that the roots of Al Qaeda actually stem from the 1979 arming of the Mujahedin in Operation Cyclone.

He could have mentioned that the US military ‘accidentally’ dropped supplies to ISIS, or the fact that the military has hit key pieces of Syrian infrastructure such as grain reserves. There sure have been a lot of convenient accidents. Maybe he could have mentioned that he thought of ISIS has terrorism’s JV team until they started threatening oil hubs in Iraq.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of this admission is that Obama knows that it was Bush’s flawed foreign policy tactics that led to the rise of ISIS, yet he carries out basically the same exact policies.

Maybe Obama will be admitting more things as his final term comes to an end.

However, it’s much more likely that he will not, and instead will insidiously make it appear as if he’s making some huge admission when actually he is leading people into believing falsehoods.

Barack Obama’s statements are by definition lying by omission.


This article (Obama Actually Admits The Rise of ISIS Was Due to The US Government) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org. Tune in to the Anti-Media radio show Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.

The post Obama Actually Admits The Rise of ISIS Was Due to The US Government appeared first on The Anti-Media.

Read more here:: Obama Actually Admits The Rise of ISIS Was Due to The US Government

      

Hillary Clinton’s Scandalous E-Mails

By The Rundown Live

Hillary Clinton's Scandalous E-Mails

How, if at all, will Secretary Clinton’s incompetence affect her prospective presidential campaign?

FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/TeenTake<br />INSTAGRAM: http://www.instagram.com/TeenTake
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/DemeterAndrew

Andrew Demeter is a young American political activist, amateur filmmaker, entrepreneur, journalist, and author. His documentary ‘We The People, Genetically-Modified?’ won first prize in C-SPAN’s 2014 StudentCam competition. To collect the award, he visited the United States Capitol in Washington D.C. where he met and questioned former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, on matters concerning the National Security Agency’s metadata collection. He recorded the short confrontation with his mobile phone, and the video subsequently went viral online. American radio host and documentary filmmaker Alex Jones has glorified Demeter as “a successful, young journalist…just by asking real questions!”.

      

Drug Dealers are Entrepreneurs and the Government is Killing Urban Innovation

By The Rundown Live

schools-of-liberation

Nick Bernabe | ANTIMEDIA

Op-Ed: How the government’s war on drugs is also war on young entrepreneurs.

Anyone with a hint of intelligence understands that the war on drugs is a complete failure. Millions of people are rotting behind bars for putting “illegal” drugs in their own bodies while “legal” drug dealers make billions pushing basically the same substances. Meanwhile, the war on drugs has done nothing to stem the use of harmful illegal substances, it has only criminalized recreational use and addiction. A little-known fact about this debate over legal and illegal drugs is that the legit ones kill more people per year than the ones you’ll go to prison for, but let’s not allow facts to get in the way of prison profits and the police state. Although a little Google search on incarceration disparity will show you how racist and regressive the drug war and “justice” system truly are, you can read this long-form piece on Anti-Media that will give you more than enough information to get you up to par on that. Various examples can be given that show drug decriminalization decreases addictions rates, not the other way around. What I want to talk about are two other little-known problems with the drug war. Urban brain drain and economics.

Urban Brain Drain.

“What do you mean, Nick?” You might be under the impression that the drug war is locking up criminals, but let me dispel this myth for you. Drug dealers are not criminals, they are entrepreneurs: they supply a product to people seeking to consume. These are products, that as I mentioned before, do not kill nearly as many people as their legal alternatives. These entrepreneurs are only criminalized by the government, not morality.

These street pharmacists are some of the smartest young people that typically don’t fit in at school because they’re unchallenged with boring and outdated material. With shitty school systems in poor urban areas — where selling drugs is one of the few ways to make money — some of these students go directly into business rather than sit through a boring class. These kids would rather learn on the streets than in a classroom; I was one of those kids.

Living in economic dead zones, families fall into a redundant cycle created by the unjust war on drugs. These families, already poor due to oppressive economic situations, are further destroyed when the heads-of-households are thrown in jail for victim-less crimes. The young people are then left the last line of defense for the family and embark on the responsibility to keep a roof over their heads, and sometimes they end up selling “illegal” drugs to do that. These individuals step outside the box, disobey unjust laws, and innovate to make a living. These are the entrepreneurs of the future who develop their businesses and help their families. Instead of holding them up as examples of urban success, our government is throwing them into jail en masse. Let the cycle repeat: the next young generation is up next.

This war on drugs is a war on the mind. The government doesn’t want people stepping out of their control. They don’t want the population committing “thought crimes.” Our Orwell-worshiping government is serious about keeping your thoughts confined within the small box created for you by the video screen hanging on the wall in your living room. They don’t want the smart ones evolving and succeeding without their consent. Their best plan of attack is to drain the urban population of their brains. They also know that those with brains can be off the radar and avoid the taxes they so desperately need. The government doesn’t want anyone to think they can operate a business without first getting their permission. “We can’t let these drug dealers operate outside the law, who will make them pay taxes? Who will regulate them? We can’t let poor people just make money like that, can we? Nope, that’s scary, throw them in jail. Fuck ‘em.” The government has no intention of improving urban areas, rather, they incriminate urban entrepreneurs. This bring us to problem number two.

Economics.

Crime and drugs go hand in hand, but the economics can not be ignored. Since making a consumer demand illegal creates a higher demand, and in turn creates a black market, crime will also be created. Street dealers often use their relatively large profits from the sale of drugs to purchase food, cars, clothes, and in some cases, launder money into legitimate businesses which creates more business for the evolving economy. — Resistance Journals

The last thing the government wants is empowered poor people walking around with a wad of cash in their pockets supporting local economies. Maybe then, we wouldn’t need the government as much. Frightening! “Go to Wal-Mart, peasants, get a job there while you’re at it. Try anything else and go straight to jail.” This the message we are being sent.

The government, with its policies like the drug war, effectively act as a monopolizing agent for Big Pharma. Any corporatized business that knows what they are doing, uses the government to squash competition. The “illegal” drug trade is no small fish,

With estimates of $100 billion to $110 billion for heroin, $110 billion to $130 billion for cocaine, $75 billion for cannabis and $60 billion for synthetic drugs, the probable global figure for the total illicit drug industry would be approximately $360 billion. Given the conservative bias in some of the estimates for individual substances, a turnover of around $400 billion per annum is considered realistic.

As you will find out below, there are many culprits who pour a lot money every year into the government to lock you up for selling weed. Who pays to keep cannabis illegal? Well, it’s the groups that make the most money from imprisoning massive amounts of people. Here are the real criminals, compiled by Republic Report,

Pharmaceutical Corporations: Pharmaceutical interests would like to keep marijuana illegal so American don’t have the option of cheap medical alternatives to their products. Howard Wooldridge, a retired police officer who now lobbies the government to relax marijuana prohibition laws, told Republic Report that next to police unions, the “second biggest opponent on Capitol Hill is big Pharma” because marijuana can replace “everything from Advil to Vicodin and other expensive pills.”

Private Prisons Corporations: Private prison corporations make millions by incarcerating people who have been imprisoned for drug crimes, including marijuana. As Republic Report’s Matt Stoller noted last year, Corrections Corporation of America, one of the largest for-profit prison companies, revealed in a regulatory filing that continuing the drug war is part in parcel to their business strategy. Prison companies have spent millions bankrolling pro-drug war politicians and have used secretive front groups, like the American Legislative Exchange Council, to pass harsh sentencing requirements for drug crimes.

Alcohol and Beer Companies: Fearing competition for the dollars Americans spend on leisure, alcohol and tobacco interests have lobbied to keep marijuana out of reach. For instance, the California Beer & Beverage Distributors contributed campaign contributions to a committee set up to prevent marijuana from being legalized and taxed.

Police Unions: Police departments across the country have become dependent on federal drug war grants to finance their budget. In March, we published a story revealing that a police union lobbyist in California coordinated the effort to defeat Prop 19, a ballot measure in 2010 to legalize marijuana, while helping his police department clients collect tens of millions in federal marijuana-eradication grants. And it’s not just in California. Federal lobbying disclosures show that other police union lobbyists have pushed for stiffer penalties for marijuana-related crimes nationwide.

Prison Guard Unions: Prison guard unions have a vested interest in keeping people behind bars just like for-profit prison companies. In 2008, the California Correctional Peace Officers Association spent a whopping $1 million to defeat a measure that would have “reduced sentences and parole times for nonviolent drug offenders while emphasizing drug treatment over prison.”

So you see, making drugs illegal has nothing to do with morality or doing what is right — not even for health reasons. It’s about keeping the urban youth down and sustaining the real criminals’ economy. The spots these victim-less youth hold behind bars should be instead assigned to those responsible for criminalizing their attempt to survive. If these young entrepreneurs have the ability to run unconventional businesses, why would ending this war on drugs not be beneficial in the efforts to end poverty?


This article (Drug Dealers are Entrepreneurs and the Government is Killing Urban Innovation) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org. Tune in to the Anti-Media radio show Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Image credit: wikipedia. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.

The post Drug Dealers are Entrepreneurs and the Government is Killing Urban Innovation appeared first on The Anti-Media.

Read more here:: Drug Dealers are Entrepreneurs and the Government is Killing Urban Innovation

      

Police Depts that Don’t Receive the Money from Traffic Tickets, Write Far Fewer Tickets

By TheRundownLive

Thumbnail for 162424

Matt Agorist | FreeThoughtProject

St. Louis, MO — A report conducted by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posed the question, “What happens when municipalities have no financial incentive to write tickets?”

They found that the answer was quite simple; they don’t write very many tickets.

Pulling someone over for not wearing their seat belt and extorting money from them serves no purpose other than to generate revenue for the state. Many police officers know that much of their job is to collect revenue. It’s now apparent, that when given the option to conduct extortion or not, they will choose the ladder.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports:

Consider Madison County. In the Land of Lincoln, speeding and other traffic infractions are state violations. Municipalities get very little revenue from the tickets.

In 2013, police in Madison County wrote just 17 tickets per 100 residents, about half the rate of Missouri and about one-quarter of the rate of St. Louis County.

Consider Ferguson, population 21,111, which wrote 11,822 tickets last year. Or Creve Coeur, population 17,865, which wrote 14,382 tickets.

In Ferguson, traffic citations make up the second largest stream of revenue for the city. It’s blatantly obvious that the citizens of Ferguson are little more than host to a parasitic revenue collection racket that poses as a “justice system.”

Extorting people for victimless crimes to pay the $200,000 salaries of city officials is quite the opposite of “justice” and nothing close to “protecting and serving.”

It’s easy for the city officials to sit back from the safety of their plush offices and watch the revenue pour in while they send their badged grunts to extort the masses. However, many of these badged grunts hate doing it.

The Free Thought Project spoke to a police officer, who wishes to remain anonymous. He explains the revenue collection scheme as follows:

It’s easy to write tickets all day. Everyone speeds, and at night, everyone on the roads after 10:00 pm has probably been drinking. While there isn’t an official quota system in place, if we don’t pull people over and write tickets and make DUI arrests, we are essentially derelict in our duty. It sucks, none of us want to pull people over and write them a ticket, but we have to.

When cops write fewer tickets, they can devote their time to preventing and solving actual crimes. The police in Carbondale, Illinois took this approach.

Carbondale police have issued thousands fewer traffic citations and shifted their focus on neighborhood outreach instead.

The citizens of Carbondale are happy about this change, but the city officials who are losing their profits have turned to fear-mongering. Carbondale city-council woman, Jane Adams, admits that people don’t like getting tickets but claims that it lets “bad guys slip through the cracks.”

“There’s a tremendous amount of speeding. We have lots of young people, and we have lots of people who come in and have outstanding warrants for very serious crimes,” Adams tells WSLI News.

Carbondale thinks that its a win win to shakedown and extort the public. Creating criminals out of otherwise innocent people by forcing police to collect revenue can fill the city’s coffers while simultaneously catching the occasional “bad guy.”

This type of policing is great for Jane Adams, who sits back in her plush, taxpayer purchased office chair and barks orders to increase revenue so she can finally get that office view she’s always dreamed of.

But for the rest of the population it’s a police state.

Read more here:: Police Depts that Don’t Receive the Money from Traffic Tickets, Write Far Fewer Tickets

      

Police Depts that Don’t Receive the Money from Traffic Tickets, Write Far Fewer Tickets

By TheRundownLive

Thumbnail for 162424

Matt Agorist | FreeThoughtProject

St. Louis, MO — A report conducted by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch posed the question, “What happens when municipalities have no financial incentive to write tickets?”

They found that the answer was quite simple; they don’t write very many tickets.

Pulling someone over for not wearing their seat belt and extorting money from them serves no purpose other than to generate revenue for the state. Many police officers know that much of their job is to collect revenue. It’s now apparent, that when given the option to conduct extortion or not, they will choose the ladder.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch reports:

Consider Madison County. In the Land of Lincoln, speeding and other traffic infractions are state violations. Municipalities get very little revenue from the tickets.

In 2013, police in Madison County wrote just 17 tickets per 100 residents, about half the rate of Missouri and about one-quarter of the rate of St. Louis County.

Consider Ferguson, population 21,111, which wrote 11,822 tickets last year. Or Creve Coeur, population 17,865, which wrote 14,382 tickets.

In Ferguson, traffic citations make up the second largest stream of revenue for the city. It’s blatantly obvious that the citizens of Ferguson are little more than host to a parasitic revenue collection racket that poses as a “justice system.”

Extorting people for victimless crimes to pay the $200,000 salaries of city officials is quite the opposite of “justice” and nothing close to “protecting and serving.”

It’s easy for the city officials to sit back from the safety of their plush offices and watch the revenue pour in while they send their badged grunts to extort the masses. However, many of these badged grunts hate doing it.

The Free Thought Project spoke to a police officer, who wishes to remain anonymous. He explains the revenue collection scheme as follows:

It’s easy to write tickets all day. Everyone speeds, and at night, everyone on the roads after 10:00 pm has probably been drinking. While there isn’t an official quota system in place, if we don’t pull people over and write tickets and make DUI arrests, we are essentially derelict in our duty. It sucks, none of us want to pull people over and write them a ticket, but we have to.

When cops write fewer tickets, they can devote their time to preventing and solving actual crimes. The police in Carbondale, Illinois took this approach.

Carbondale police have issued thousands fewer traffic citations and shifted their focus on neighborhood outreach instead.

The citizens of Carbondale are happy about this change, but the city officials who are losing their profits have turned to fear-mongering. Carbondale city-council woman, Jane Adams, admits that people don’t like getting tickets but claims that it lets “bad guys slip through the cracks.”

“There’s a tremendous amount of speeding. We have lots of young people, and we have lots of people who come in and have outstanding warrants for very serious crimes,” Adams tells WSLI News.

Carbondale thinks that its a win win to shakedown and extort the public. Creating criminals out of otherwise innocent people by forcing police to collect revenue can fill the city’s coffers while simultaneously catching the occasional “bad guy.”

This type of policing is great for Jane Adams, who sits back in her plush, taxpayer purchased office chair and barks orders to increase revenue so she can finally get that office view she’s always dreamed of.

But for the rest of the population it’s a police state.

Read more here:: Police Depts that Don’t Receive the Money from Traffic Tickets, Write Far Fewer Tickets

      

US Government Threatened Germany Over Aiding Snowden

By The Rundown Live

SnowdenGermany

S.m. Gibson | ANTIMEDIA

“They told us they would stop notifying us of plots and other intelligence matters.”

Although previously speculated, the United States did in fact strong arm at least one nation to prevent them from offering Edward Snowden asylum or aiding him in securing travel arrangements via their country, according to Snowden associate Glenn Greenwald.

German Vice Chancellor Sigmar Gabriel stated this week that the United States threatened to halt relaying all intelligence information with Berlin if they assisted the NSA whistleblower in anyway. “They told us they would stop notifying us of plots and other intelligence matters,” Gabriel said.

Gabriel commended the work of Greenwald and other reporters as he delivered a speech regarding the journalistic efforts made concerning the Snowden leaks. The Vice Chancellor displayed regret that the former Booz Allen employee was forced to seek political shelter in “Putin’s autocratic Russia”. As the German leader elaborated that no nation was able or inclined to offer Snowden assistance, an interjecting voice from the crowd bellowed out, “Why don’t you bring him to Germany, then?”

Gabriel countered the interruption by claiming that his government would be legally bound to extradite the American refugee if he stepped foot on German soil.

At the conclusion of the address, Greenwald, who was present at the event, questioned Gabriel as to the truth about why Germany didn’t offer Snowden asylum — because under international law, once asylum status has been granted, the subject would no longer be considered a fugitive. According to The Intercept, the vice chancellor responded by saying,

The U.S. government had aggressively threatened the Germans that if they did so, they would be “cut off” from all intelligence sharing. That would mean, if the threat were carried out, that the Americans would literally allow the German population to remain vulnerable to a brewing attack discovered by the Americans by withholding that information from their government.

This would basically mean that the U.S. was prepared to hold the people of Germany and their safety hostage in the name of pride. If for some reason Vice Chancellor Gabriel was not being truthful in his remarks, his words could be deemed a fear tactic in order to make the people of Germany believe that asylum for Snowden is a detriment to their own well-being. Either way you look at it, the people of both the United States and Germany, along with their freedoms, come out on the losing end.


This article (US Government Threatened Germany Over Aiding Snowden) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author and TheAntiMedia.org. Tune in to the Anti-Media radio show Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific. Help us fix our typos: edits@theantimedia.org.

The post US Government Threatened Germany Over Aiding Snowden appeared first on The Anti-Media.

Read more here:: US Government Threatened Germany Over Aiding Snowden

      

The Rundown Live #454 Open Lines (The Lost Episode)

By TheRundownLive

454

The Rundown Live #454 Open Lines (The Lost Episode) (3/20/15)

The Rundown Live LIVE M-F 8C/9E

On this Friday edition of The Rundown Live, Kristan and I go over the sponsors, and the site before we open up the lines, getting into many topics like, complete failure, plus much more. This one is worth checking out! Make sure you like, recommend and subscribe! Links below!

Audio Version Here
454

YouTube:

goo.gl/BAI4Z

Make sure you guys tune in live! Join us in the chat!

To Call In Live 1(414)-455-4333 M-F 9PM-10PM EST

Live Audio/Video/Chatroom:
http://RundownLive.com/Live
Truth Frequency http://truthfrequencyradio.com/

Encore on FPRN Radio Network http://FPRNRadio.com/ 12AM CST

http://livestream.com/bigpzone

Stitcher Radio: http://www.stitcher.com/podcast/the-rundown-live?refid=stpr

Listen Live via Phone Free : (231)460-1035

Sign up for a Monthly Subscription to fund us!
https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=FTJPVB5LWZK72

https://www.patreon.com/therundownlive

DONATE BITCOIN TO #RUNDOWNLIVE

rundownbitc

1DqaUC81xg8WMsU2udHThkKHHYgDn3PG8H

Listen to The Rundown Live today!!

Smartphone Apps:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/id393387997?mt=8
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.therundownlive.android.therundown&hl=en

Itunes:
https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-rundown-live/id918964452?mt=2

Facebook:
http://fb.com/TheRundownLive
http://www.facebook.com/bigpzone
http://www.facebook.com/kristantharris

Twitter:
http://twitter.com/RundownLive
http://twitter.com/bigpzone
http://twitter.com/kristantharris

Subscribe to “The Awakening” List here:
http://bit.ly/TheAwakeningOnFB
(2,000+ Truth LIKE Pages)

      

  • mostrecentshows
  • Can A Country Survive With Open Borders? - Disassociation Nation - 11/28/16

    Can A Country Survive With Open Borders? - Disassociation Nation - 11/28/16Niz and Paul welcome Shane Radliff to talk about his Direct Action series and a discussion burning up the Liberty community, Muh Borders! It's Spy vs. Spy vs You as the UK sets up to pass the largest domestic spy legistaltion in Western History. What happened to Kanye West? We announce our Tyrant of the week, and find out what's in your Aloe Vera. Disassociation Nation reveals the sordid underbelly of the dystopian reality of the American Dream.  We explore that reality while examining the principles of liberty that could liberate us all from the coercive enterprise that is the United States [more]

    Disassociation Nation - Guests: Lousander Feen & Danny Roldan - 11/21/16

    Disassociation Nation - Guests: Lousander Feen & Danny Roldan - 11/21/16Tonight on Disassociation Nation, Niz and Paul we're joined by Danny Roldan former member of 'We are Change' and Lousander Feen one of the hosts from Freedom Feens. The conversation started with the anti-gun referendum before the conversation switches to a debate on minarchism versus anarchy and how to end the state.  We end the show with Lou, Niz and Paul discussing the EU's attempt to pull Britain back in and how decentralized technologies are undermining the myth of the state.   Disassociation Nation reveals the sordid underbelly of the dystopian reality of the American Dream.  We explore that reality while examining [more]

    Liberty Under Attack - Government Regulations & The Vaping Industry with Guest, Jeff Nyzio - 11/17/16

    Liberty Under Attack - Government Regulations & The Vaping Industry with Guest, Jeff Nyzio - 11/17/16On tonight’s final live broadcast of Liberty Under Attack Radio on the Freedom Phalanx Radio Network, we were joined by Jeff Nyzio, host of Disassociation Nation, another show on the network. For most of the show, we discussed the impact the recent vaping regulations will have on the industry, as well as how it crushed his entrepreneurial venture. In the final segment, we do Fascistbook news and he tell us how to make our own vape juice, and provides some warnings for those that are considering entering the black/grey market. Make sure to find our future shows on iTunes, Tunein Radio, Stitcher [more]

    Disassociation Nation - Guest: Alex James from Backwordz - 11/14/16

    Disassociation Nation - Guest: Alex James from Backwordz - 11/14/16Tonight on Disassociation Nation, Niz and Paul are joined by Alex James from the Band Backwordz to talk about their upcoming album release. The conversation after the half time turns to the incremental organization of state abolition.   Disassociation Nation reveals the sordid underbelly of the dystopian reality of the American Dream.  We explore that reality while examining the principles of liberty that could liberate us all from the coercive enterprise that is the United States of America. You’ll laugh, you’ll cry, you’ll disassociate from the state. No flag waving here, folks, just unadulterated liberty. Click for More about Disassociation Nation LIVE: Mondays 8:00pm-10:00pm Eastern [more]

    Liberty Under Attack - Moderated Debate on Peaceful Parenting & Spanking - 11/10/16

    Liberty Under Attack - Moderated Debate on Peaceful Parenting & Spanking - 11/10/16On tonight’s broadcast of Liberty Under Attack Radio, we hosted a Peaceful Parenting debate between Kevin Geary and Kyle Rearden; Kevin is for the concept, and Kyle is against it. Please make sure to check out the Twitter link below and let us know who you think won. If you enjoyed this broadcast and appreciate the work we do, please consider contributing financially. Just visit www.libertyunderattack.com and use the buttons on the sidebar. To purchase the direct action series in its entirety, see below. Links: Let us know who you think won [Poll]: https://twitter.com/LUAradio/status/796911801610993665 Check out Kevin’s website: http://revolutionaryparent.com/ Check out Kyle’s website: www.thelastbastille.com Kyle’s [more]

    Liberty Under Attack - The "Sovereign Citizens" are Co-opting the CYVR Remedy - 11/03/16

    Liberty Under Attack - The On this broadcast of Liberty Under Attack Radio, Kyle Rearden joins me as we complete part three in our "sovereign citizen" trilogy. First, I discuss my recent meeting with some college students from the political organization Turning Point USA. Secondly, we discuss the method of strategic withdrawal that we promote, known as cancelling the voter registration. We close out the show with an in-depth discussion regarding a potential co-opting of the CYVR method by those who call themselves "_______ State Nationals" (i.e. Texas, Iowa, Illinois). This is certainly a broadcast you don't want to miss. If you enjoyed this broadcast and [more]

    Liberty Under Attack - Scientific Consensus Series pt. 2 - 10/27/16

    Liberty Under Attack - Scientific Consensus Series pt. 2 - 10/27/16On tonight’s broadcast of Liberty Under Attack Radio, we present part 2 of our scientific consensus series (or, science more generally). Darrell Becker and Dr. Stephanie Murphy join me as we discuss the notion of scientific consensus, concerns with scientific research today, the fascinating human mind when it comes to placebo (and nocebo effects), Stephanie’s experience getting her Ph.D, and much more. The show was entirely off-the-cuff, as the outline wasn’t even touched upon. It was a fantastic discussion. If you enjoyed this broadcast and appreciate the work we do, please consider contributing financially. Just visit www.libertyunderattack.com and use the buttons on [more]

    Disassociation Nation - Taxation is Slavery, and You Love It - 10/24/16

    Disassociation Nation - Taxation is Slavery, and You Love It - 10/24/16Tonight on Disassociation Nation Niz and Paul are joined by Lousander Feen from the Freedom Feens as well as Lisa DeLasho from Nutritional Anarchy. The show kicks off talking about Lisa's current projects. After the 30 minute mark the conversation shifts to taxation and government sanctioned theft. The show wraps up with a few tips on how to avoid the taxman without getting shot. Disassociation Nation reveals the sordid underbelly of the dystopian reality of the American Dream.  We explore that reality while examining the principles of liberty that could liberate us all from the coercive enterprise that is the United [more]

    Liberty Under Attack - Oh, You Think Your Vote Matters in a Presidential Election? That's Cute - 10/23/16

    Liberty Under Attack - Oh, You Think Your Vote Matters in a Presidential Election? That's Cute - 10/23/16Tonight’s broadcast of Liberty Under Attack Radio is titled, “Oh, you think your vote matters in a Presidential election? That’s cute.” Kyle Rearden, our creative consultant, joins us to offer his thoughts and conclusions on the subjects at hand. Namely, the fact that the President is not elected by popular vote (that is, the electorate); rather, the President is chosen by the electors. In other words, your vote especially doesn’t matter in Presidential elections, although that is the one that is the most heavily focused on. We also tell you how government officials in the other two branches of government constitutionally gain [more]

  • addwaystolisten
    archives
    tunein
    itunes
    FPRN Archives
    Whether you want to listen to the newest show, or take a trip to the past & check out some of our oldest broadcasts, you can find it all in the archives. Feel free to browse, download, or just stream, you can do it all right from the show's profile page:

    1. Head to the FPRN Radio Archives.
    2. Select the show of your choice (for show descriptions/bios, see our All Shows Page).
    3. Once on the profile page of the show you selected, you can listen to and/or download the latest broadcast, as well as any previous broadcast.
    Tune In Radio
    Begin listening to the FPRN Radio live stream on your smartphone or mobile device NOW from virtually anywhere with Tune In Radio for Apple iOS and Android:

    1. Go to the App Store on your smartphone or mobile device.
    2. Do a search for Tune In Radio.
    3. Download the App to your smartphone or mobile device.
    4. Once the download is complete, open the App and type FPRN Radio in the search bar.
    5. Click Enter and begin listening.
    6. To save FPRN Radio in the presets, tap on the heart while listening to the stream.
    iTunes
    Listen to your favorite shows on-demand on your PC, smartphone or mobile device when you subscribe to the FPRN Radio iTunes Podcast. Here's how:
    1. To subscribe with your computer, open iTunes, go to the iTunes Store & search for FPRN Radio and subscribe.
    2. To subscribe with your smartphone or mobile device, you will first need a podcasting app.
    3. We recommend Apple's Podcast App(free with the latest iOS), Downcast($1.99 for iOS) or OneCast(free for Android).
    4. Once downloaded, open the app & Browse or Search for FPRN Radio and Subscribe to the podcast.
    stitcher
  • vtuner
    streema
  • streamfinder
    internetradio
  • schedulebanner